ENHANCING THE SKILLSOF FUTURE EDUCATORS TO ASSESS SCIENCE LEARNING USING THE KIRKPATRICK EDUCATIONAL MODEL

Hristivelina Zhecheva

Abstract


The scientific communication presents a variant of a technological solution for applying the Kirkpatrick model for the evaluation of learning systems in the university and secondary school settings. The four successive levels of evaluation of science curricula are examined.

Keywords


Kirkpatrick Educational Model, science learning, teachers of chemistry.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Zhecheva, H. (2021). Proektirane na obuchenie po himiya v usloviya na uchebno eksperimentirane. Izd. „Libra Skorp“, Burgas.

Zhecheva, H. (2021). Dizayn na obuchenieto−ot obshti modeli kam konkretni pedagogicheski praktiki. Izd. „Libra Skorp“, Burgas.

Dick, W., L. Carey (1985). The systematic design of instruction (2nd ed.). Glen view, IL: Scott, Foresman.

Dick and Carey Instructional Model. (2015). Educational Technology, November 23.

Gagné, R., L. Briggs, W. Wager (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Forth Worth, Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

Gagne, R., W. Wager, K. Golas, J. Keller (2005). Principles of In- structiona lDesign (5th ed.). California: Wadsworth.

Gagné, R. (2013). Instructional technology: foundations. Routledge.

Kaufman, R. (2000). Mega Planning: Practical Tools for Organiza- tional Success. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publications. (Also Planificación Mega: Herramientas practicas paral el exito organizacional. (2004). Traducción de Sonia Agut. Universitat Jaume I, Castelló280. de la Plana, Espana.

Kirkpatrick, D. (1996). Revisiting Kirkpatrick’s four-level-model. Training & Development, 1.

Kirkpatrick, D., J. Kirkpatrick (2007). Implementing the Four Lev- els, Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Kurt, S. (2017). Definitions of Instructional Technology, Educa- tional Technology, February 18.

Merrill, M. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Tech- nology, Research and Development; 50, 3; ProQuest Education Journals.

Phillips, J. (1996). How much is the training worth? Training and Development, 50(4), 20-24.

Popham, W. (1975). Educational evaluation. EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Thorndike, E. L. (1912). Education: A firstbook. New York: Mac Millan.

Stufflebeam, D., W. Foley, W. Gephart, E. Guba, R.Hammond, H. Merriman, M. Provus (1971). Educational evaluation and decision mak- ing. Itasca, IL: Peacock.

Serrat O. (2017) The Five Whys Technique. In: Knowledge Solu- tions. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983- 9_32.

Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (American Educational Research Association Monograph Serieson Curriculum Evaluation, No. 1). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Scriven, M. (1974). Evaluation perspective and procedures. In W. J. Popham (Ed.), Evaluation in education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.