Sema Konyali, Yasemin Oraman


Sustainable rural development is vital to the economic, social and environmental viability of nations. It is essential for poverty eradication since global poverty is overwhelmingly rural. Rural development should be viewed as the core of any viable strategy for national development in developing countries where an average 2/3 of the population live in rural areas. It is important for agriculture to keep rural population in place by developing the rural and increasing its attractiveness. Agriculture is the primary means of living in countryside throughout the world. Therefore, it is evident that agricultural supports are effective in reducing poverty in rural parts of the country and ensuring sustainability.

Turkey’s agricultural economy is among the top ten in the world, with half of the country consisting of agricultural land and nearly a quarter of the population employed in agriculture. But, the rapid industrialization of Turkey after 1930's and government policies caused agriculture's share to decline in overall income. This caused the fall of economic standards of the farmers and contributed to emigration from rural to urban areas. Agricultural supports given to producers are important in order to keep the rural population in place. However in Turkey, agricultural supports meet a small portion of the input cost of the producer and the increase in input prices is higher than the increase in product prices. Some years, supports are insufficient for producers. According to the agreement with the IMF's agricultural support, it is limited to 1% of GDP (Gross Domestic Product). But the producers have taken only the half of their support. These supports must be increased for protecting producers. Because the input prices are very high in Turkey and producers are affected negatively. Supports should increase the farmer’s income and resolve the structural problems of the sector in order to build a sector that is competitive and independent. However, such supports are not alone sufficient in explaining farmer welfare and rural poverty. There are several natural, economic, social, cultural, and even political factors affecting agricultural and rural welfare levels. The sources allocated to rural development projects that contribute to reverse the migration trends by improving the working and living conditions in rural spaces must be increased. Because developing the farmer means developing the agriculture, economy and country. Therefore, it is extremely important to implement consistent and sustainable agricultural policies in agriculture.

In this research, the current situation of agricultural support policies, their effects to farmers and to sustainable rural development were evaluated and solutions were offered regarding these problems.


Sustainable rural development, Agricultural supports, Producer, Support policy, Turkey

Full Text:



Abay, C., Sayan, S., Miran, B., & Bayaner, A. (2001) Türkiye’deki tarımsal destek harcamalarının enflasyonist, etkilerinin ekonometrik analizi. Ankara: TEAE Yayınları.

Aktaş, E., Altıok, M., & Songur, M. (2015) Farklı Ülkelerdeki Tarımsal Destekleme Politikalarının Tarımsal Üretim Üzerine Etkisinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(4), 55–74.

Anonymous, (2017) Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation, OECD.

Armağan, G., (2008) The Structure and Production of Agriculture in Turkey urses/tei/uyg00.pdf

Enemark, S., (2005) “Understanding the Land Management Paradigm”, FIG Commission 7 Symposium Innovative Technologies for Land Administration, 19-25 June 2005, Madison – Wisconsin, USA.

MAF, (2018) Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Annual Activity Report

Miran, B., (2006) Agricultural structure and production, Agriculture in Turkey (Ed. Fahri Yavuz), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Publications of Strategy Development Department, Ankara, Turkey, in Turkish.

Myrdal, G., (1984) International inequality and foreign aid in retrospect. Pioneers in development, 151-165.

Official Gazette. 2006. Tarım Kanunu. Kanun No: 5488. Kabul Tarihi: 18.04.2006. (available at: 0060425-1.htm).

Republic of Turkey Ministry of Treasury and Finance, 2018.

Polidori, R., Romano D., (1996) Agricoltura e sviluppo, dattiloscritto, lavori preparatori di ‘Agricola 96’ Conferenza Provinciale dell’Agricoltura, Firenze 18 novembre.

Soyak, M., (1996) Rant Arama: Türk Tarım Sektöründe Destekleme Politikaları Yoluyla Aktarılan Rantlar Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 7(23), 87–112.

Tan, S., Tan, S.S., Everest, B., Hasdemir, M., (2016) Agricultural Support Policies and Public Budgeting in Turkey, Management Studies, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 237-242.

Tanrıvermiş, H., Bülbül, M., (2007) The Role of Agriculture in Turkish Economy at the Beginning of the European Union Accession Negotiations, Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 7 (4): 612-625, 2007.

Ulger, N.E., Aydemir, S., Iban, M.C., Akbulut, H., (2018) Land Use Problems and Land Management: A Land Inventory Study in Istanbul, “2018 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty” The World Bank - Washington DC, March 19-23.

Yapar, S., (2005). Türkiye’de Tarımsal Ekonomi ve “Desteklememe” Politikasının Bir Aracı Olarak Doğrudan Gelir Desteği Sitemi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 5(2), 21 37.

Yavuz, F., (2019) A Look into Turkey’s Agricultural Policies,, June 10.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.