COMPARING THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND TURKEY FOR SOME ORGANIC PRODUCTS

Derya Ilkay Abdikoglu, Gökhan Unakitan, Yasemin Oraman, Fuat Yilmaz

Abstract


Organic agriculture is a production system that sustains the health of soils, ecosystems and people. It relies on ecological processes, biodiversity and cycles adapted to local conditions, rather than the use of inputs with adverse effects.

The regions with the largest areas of organic agricultural land are Oceania (22,8 million ha, which is almost 45% of the world’s organic agricultural land) and Europe (12,7 million ha, 25%). Latin America has 6,7 million ha (13%) followed by Asia (4 million ha, 8%), North America (3 million ha, 6%) and Africa (1.7 million ha, 3%).

Organic agriculture in the world is developing rapidly. In 2015, organic agriculture is made in 179 countries on 51 million hectares. European and North American countries have the largest market share in 75.7 billion Euros organic product market.

In this study, comparative production advantages of selected organic products in European countries were calculated as an index on the basis of countries. The index used in the calculation is based on Balassa's index. Therefore organic and non-organic production quantities of selected products were used. These selected products were olives, grapes, apples, wheat, barley and potatoes. The data is obtained from the FAO and EUROSTAT databases covering the years 2012-2016.

According to the results, Slovenia has the largest share of organic olive production in European countries. The other countries that are leading in other organic production are: Belgium in organic grape production, Estonia in organic apple production, Italy in organic wheat and organic barley production, and Lithuania in organic potato production. The countries with the highest ratio of total organic crop area to total agricultural area are Liechtenstein, Austria and Sweden respectively.

 


Keywords


Balassa, European countries, agricultural production, organic farming.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anonymous (2018a), FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://www.fao.org/organicag, (Access Date: 10.01.2018).

Anonymous (2018b), EUROSTAT, Statistical Office of the European Union, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=org_croppro〈=en, (Access Date: 10.01.2018).

Anonymous (2018c), FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC, (Access Date: 10.01.2018).

Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalisation and ‘Revealed’ Comparative Advantage, The Manchester School, 33, 99-123.

Beningo, S. (2006). Trade and Transportation Between the United States and China and Between the United States and India. Conference of the Society of Government Economists, 27 October 2005, Washington, p: 6.

Demiryürek, K, Stopes, C., Güzel, A. (2008). Organic agriculture: The case of Turkey. Outlook on Agriculture. 37. 261-267.

Demiryürek, K. (2011). Organik Tarım Kavramı ve Organik Tarımın Dünya ve Türkiye’deki Durumu. GOÜ, Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 27-36.

Dimova, M., Palagacheva, N., Dzhuvinov, V. 2015. Organic Fruit Production in Europe. Agricultural Sciences / Agrarni Nauki. 2015, 7(17): 87-92.

Gubbuk, H., Polat, E., Pekmezci, M. 2004. Organic Fruit Production in Turkey. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, Special ed. vol. 12, 2004: 23-29.

Liesner, H.H. (1958), “The European Common Market and British Industry”, Economic Journal, 68, 302-16.

Weibel, Franco (2002) Organic Fruit Production in Europe. THE COMPACT FRUIT TREE, 35(3): 77-82.

Willer, H., Lernoud, J. (2017). The World of Organic Agriculture, Statistics and Emerging Trends 2017. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FIBL), Frick and IFOAM – Organics International, Bonn. Version 1.3 of February 20, 2017.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


New knowledge Journal of science Jubilee edition is financed by the National Science Fund of the Republic of Bulgaria – contract № ДНП 05/52 от 22.12.2016 in the competition of Bulgarian scientific periodicals – 2016

The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the position or opinion of the National Science Fund of the Republic of Bulgaria. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) only and should not be considered as representative of the National Science Fund’s official position.

https://www.fni.bg/

National Science Fund of Bulgaria